Finance, News, Politics, Tech

Apple hits an all-time high as China and the US reach trade deal

With the agreement between the US and China, Apple has narrowly avoided a 15% tariff that would’ve been applied to some of its most popular products had a scheduled round of tariffs gone into effect on December 15.

That would’ve hiked the prices of some of Apple’s flagship products. The price of the iPhone could’ve gone up as much as $150, according to Daniel Ives of Wedbush, which would’ve lowered demand for the product by as much as 8%. The iPad and MacBook would also have been subject to price increases.

Apple had been pushing back against the potential tariffs. In November, the company filed requests to be excluded from the December 15 round of tariffs, according to Bloomberg. Even President Trump said that he was looking into whether or not Apple should be exempt from the tax during a November visit to Apple’s Texas facility.

The company has a majority of its supply chain in China, including a main iPhone assembly plant in Zhengzhou that is responsible for producing half of the iPhones in the world.

If the increase in Apple’s stock price holds through the end of trading Friday, it will mark a four-day streak of gains for the company. Earlier in the week, Apple was unseated as the world’s most valuable company when its roughly $1.2 trillion market valuation was beaten by Saudi Aramco, which now has a market capitalization of more than $2 trillion.

Apple hits an all-time high as China and the US reach a phase one trade deal

Shares of Apple rose as much as 1.3% Friday to a fresh all-time record as China and the US reach a phase one trade deal that includes some tariff relief. With the agreement between the US and China, Apple has narrowly avoided a 15% tariff that would’ve been applied to some of its most popular products had a scheduled round of tariffs gone into effect on December 15.

*Muvison may earn an Affiliate Commission if you purchase something through recommended links in this site. Thank you for your support.

Featured, Games, News, Tech

Game: New Resident Evil 3 Remake

In case you hadn’t heard, Resident Evil 3‘s long-awaited return is officially happening.

Akin to this year’s fantastic Resident Evil 2, Capcom has confirmed plans to follow up one of 2019’s best games with yet another gorgeous-looking remake. A retelling of Jill Valentine’s nightmarish struggle to escape Raccoon City in its final hours is scheduled to arrive in spring 2020 and, judging purely on the initial trailers we’ve seen so far, fans of the survival horror franchise are in for a treat come release day.

Clearly confident in the quality of its upcoming installment, Capcom has wasted no time in sharing further details for the title, including a first-look at gameplay. The footage, while admittedly brief, can be seen above and, besides providing another look at the zombie-infested city, reveals the return of a popular feature.

The players will, once again, be able to outwit the mutated Tyrant but have a number of tools – besides running – available to help them do so. Just more proof that Capcom knows exactly what it’s doing with these revisits, then, and we can’t wait to see more over the coming months.

Resident Evil 3 releases April 3rd for PlayStation 4, Xbox One and PC.

Have a Fun !

*Muvison may earn an Affiliate Commission if you purchase something through recommended links in this site. Thank you for your support.

Games, News, Tech

Online Games Can Be Fun for Everyone

If you wish to say you hate games then you’re also counting courtship. All of the internet games are free. Among the most common on-line games is Counter-strike. There are several reasons to relish free internet games.

Today online games are the very best option for kids and youngsters too. Playing online games is among the most well-known pastimes, and not only for the youth. Fun online games incorporate a number of brainteasers also. Folks can chose from a number of fun online games offered and believe me, there are lots of choices to suit unique tastes and preferences.

If people want to play games, they wish to have the ability to play soonest possible. Some individuals play the online games to make money, but a few of them play the online games to become rid of their professional and the personal tension. Movie, internet casino, games, upgrade your concentration level to a good extent.

What’s Really Happening with Online Games

There are lots of games online which could keep you hooked for hours together. Online games are in reality created for people of just about any age including children to grandparents. The internet arcade games benefit players with respect to increasing their capabilities which include fast reflexes and fast thinking practice.

How to Choose Online Games

You will see free of charge games readily available on virtually every sport site. Now, even the on-line games are incorporating the flash software to produce their games look appealing. 3D online games also have been available for some time now, and enjoy exponential growth in popularity among all of the action and adventure games out there.

To some parents, online games aren’t great for children. They are one of the best forms of entertainment that you can get from using the internet. Online computer games are here in order to stay and are now developing a fantastic sense of excitement among people. No cost online games provide you the chance to meet up new friends on line.

If you would like to find the hottest games all you have to do is to type the term best RPG games on your browser’s search section and in a short time you are going to have a list of all of the newest fantasy world games. Online games amazingly appeal everyone around the world. In most first-person type games, the internet game makes it possible for the death match or arena kind of play. Online flash games are incredibly exciting to execute. They are more than just shooting, killing and other crazy stuff, they can also prove to be quite educational for kids as well. Some Flash online games may also be quite intricate.

The Online Games Cover Up

Games are always part of childhood. Sport and biking games are definitely the most well-known sorts of online game lovers. Other games give educational info, such as world history and geography. You’ll also find there some other free on-line games of cars, absolutely free on-line games of girls, free internet games of education for children, free internet action games for children, totally free on-line games of adventure for children and lot of different games too.

Have a Fun !

*Muvison may earn an Affiliate Commission if you purchase something through recommended links in this site. Thank you for your support.

Games, News, Tech

Call of Duty Mobile Breaks Record with 100 Million Downloads in Its First Week

Call of Duty Mobile Breaks Record with 100 Million Downloads in Its First Week

Call of Duty Mobile has had the best launch of any mobile game ever after generating more than 100 million downloads worldwide in its first week, according to Sensor Tower Store Intelligence estimates.

Call of Duty Mobile has had the best launch of any mobile game ever after generating more than 100 million downloads worldwide in its first week, according to Sensor Tower Store Intelligence estimates.

*Muvison may earn an Affiliate Commission if you purchase something through recommended links in this site. Thank you for your support.

Featured, Games, News, Tech

Nintendo’s president said “more 3DS franchises” will appear on Switch

Thanks to the Switch Lite’s success, Nintendo is looking into bringing more of its 3DS franchises to the console-handheld hybrid in the future.

Wall Street Journal tech reporter Takashi Mochizuki tweeted that Nintendo Japan’s current president, Shuntaro Furukawa, said the “company would make more 3DS franchises available on Switch.” Such a move is already happening with Brain Age, which is getting a new entry this December in Japan. A Western release for the new Brain Age game has yet to be announced.

The news rides on the back of Nintendo Switch Lite’s growing popularity, as the company mentioned in its earnings report that the console sold approximately two million units worldwide in just 11 days since its September 20 launch.

Following Luigi’s Mansion 3’s launch, the next big games headed to the Nintendo Switch are Pokemon Sword / Shield, which comes out on November 15. There are a few Switch games sprinkled between Sword and Shield’s launch, such as Just Dance 2020 (November 5), Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Games: Tokyo 2020 (November 5), Disney Tsum Tsum Festival (November 8), New Super Lucky’s Tale (November 8), and Romancing SaGa 3 (November 11).

Have a fun !

*Muvison may earn an Affiliate Commission if you purchase something through recommended links in this site. Thank you for your support.

Featured, Games, News, Tech

A multiplayer game that will become famous: Land of War

On December Gamercruel LTD will launch LOW – an action multiplayer game, available on PC and Android.

The game is created and developed by Aptechmedia Games Company and published by Gamercruel LTD.

LOW – Land of War can be played in 3 different areas, at the player’s choice against 3 enemies: aliens, zombies and predators.

Also PvP combat zones will be available for single player or clan vs clan.

You can subscribe to the news about the game here.

Have a fun !

*Muvison may earn an Affiliate Commission if you purchase something through recommended links in this site. Thank you for your support.

News, Politics, Tech

Facebook Stands for Free Expression

Since starting Facebook in 2004, I’ve focused on building services that give people voice and bring them together. Throughout history, these objectives have gone hand in hand—even if it doesn’t feel that way today. Frederick Douglass once called free expression “the great moral renovator of society.” Movements like #BlackLivesMatter and #MeToo depend on people openly sharing their experiences. And the ability to speak freely has been central in the global fight for democracy. Allowing greater numbers of people to share their perspectives is how society becomes more inclusive.

But increasingly, this idea is being challenged. Some believe that free expression is driving us apart rather than bringing us together. Others from across the political spectrum believe that achieving their preferred political outcome is more important than allowing every person to have a voice.

The power of individuals to express themselves has expanded rapidly in recent decades. But in times of social turmoil, there’s often an impulse to pull back on free expression. Martin Luther King Jr. wrote his “Letter From a Birmingham Jail” while locked up for protesting peacefully. When America was polarized about its role in World War I, the Supreme Court ruled that the prominent socialist Eugene V. Debs could be imprisoned for an antiwar speech.

Today, in another time of social tension, the impulse to restrict speech is back. We face a choice: We can stand for free expression, understanding its messiness but believing that the long journey toward progress requires confronting ideas that challenge us. Or we can decide the cost is too great.

I believe we must stand for free expression. But three major threats stand in the way.

First, laws around the world are undermining expression by restricting speech and imposing one country’s speech restrictions on others. Until recently, the internet was mostly defined by American platforms with strong free-expression values. But there’s no guarantee these values will win out. A decade ago, almost all the major internet platforms were American. Today, six of the top 10 are Chinese. While encrypted services like WhatsApp are used by protesters and activists everywhere, on TikTok—the Chinese app growing quickly around the world—mention of protests are censored, even in the U.S. As American policy makers define internet regulations to address public safety, they should help free expression triumph.

The second challenge to free expression is the internet platforms themselves—including Facebook. Facebook makes a lot of decisions that affect people’s ability to express themselves. Our values are inspired by the American tradition, but a strict First Amendment standard would mean allowing content like terrorist propaganda or bullying. Most Americans agree that people should be free to say things others don’t like, but no one should be able to put others in danger. So the question is where to draw the line.

At Facebook, we’re focused on addressing viral misinformation that could lead to imminent physical harm, like misleading health advice. We’ve built specific systems to remove threats such as child exploitation. In countries at risk of conflict, we take down content that could lead to imminent violence or genocide, and we’ve built systems that can detect risks of self-harm within minutes.

There are diverging views on what people consider dangerous. If someone shares a video of a racist attack, are they condemning it or glorifying it? Are they using normal slang, or using an innocent word in a new way to incite violence? Now multiply those challenges by 100 different languages.

Or take misinformation. No one tells us they want to see misinformation. But people enjoy satire, and they often tell stories that have inaccuracies but speak to a larger truth. Even with a common set of facts, media outlets emphasize different angles. I worry about an erosion of truth, but I don’t think most people want a world where you can share only things that tech companies judge to be 100% true.

I don’t think it’s right for a private company to censor politicians or the news in a democracy. Like the other major internet platforms and most media, Facebook doesn’t fact-check political ads. And if content is newsworthy, we won’t take it down. There are exceptions—even for politicians we don’t allow content if there’s a risk of real-world harm, and we don’t allow voter suppression.

I’ve considered whether we should ban political ads altogether. They are a small part of Facebook’s business and the controversy they create isn’t worth it. But advertising is an important component of free expression. Banning political ads gives an unfair advantage to incumbents and media favorites. It’s also unclear where the line should be drawn. Many ads are about issues, not elections. Would we ban ads about immigration or women’s empowerment? If not, would it really make sense to give everyone but candidates a voice in political debates? There’s no simple answer, and I believe we should err on the side of allowing greater expression.

But I also believe Facebook shouldn’t be making so many important decisions about speech on its own. That’s why we’re establishing an independent Oversight Board that will make binding decisions on what content stays up and comes down. Neither my team nor I will be able to overturn these decisions. We’re going to appoint members to this board who have a diversity of views and backgrounds, but who each hold free expression as a paramount value.

The third challenge to expression comes from politics. Some say free speech is dangerous because it may lead to outcomes they find unacceptable. Others believe the stakes are so high that they can no longer trust their fellow citizens with the power to communicate or decide what to believe for themselves.

I believe these views are more dangerous for democracy than any speech could be. You can’t impose tolerance from the top down. It has to come from people opening up, sharing experiences, and developing a common understanding of the society in which they live.

So how do we turn the tide? Someone once told me the Founders thought free expression was like air—you don’t miss it until it’s gone. I’m more optimistic. I believe in giving people a voice because I believe in people. Progress isn’t linear. Sometimes we take two steps forward and one step back. But if we can’t agree to let each other talk about the issues, we’ll never even take that first step.

Mr. Zuckerberg is founder and CEO of Facebook. This is adapted from a speech he delivered Thursday as part of Georgetown University’s Democracy in the Digital Age series.

*Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of Muvison.

*Muvison may earn an Affiliate Commission if you purchase something through recommended links in this site. Thank you for your support.

News, Tech

Apple ‘sorry’ that workers listened to Siri voice recordings

Apple has apologised following revelations that it paid third-party workers to listen to voice recordings of Siri users. The practice known as “grading” has been used by several tech firms as a way of improving the quality of speech recognition.

However, Apple, Google and Microsoft all halted such work recently, following public outcry. Apple said it plans to resume grading – but only for Siri users who opt in. The firm added that in the future only its own employees will be able to access recordings, not third-party workers at contracted firms.

Earlier this month, the company said it had halted grading following reports that workers had heard recordings containing intimate remarks made by Siri users. Such recordings can be made accidentally, for example when the Siri app interprets another word or noise as the utterance “Hey Siri”, which is used to launch voice recognition.

Now, Apple says it has completed a review of such work. “As a result of our review, we realise we haven’t been fully living up to our high ideals, and for that we apologise,” the firm said in a statement.

Up until grading was halted, 0.2% of Siri audio recordings was reviewed by human workers, Apple added. The company said that three main changes would take place before human grading of Siri recordings was resumed. It said:

  • audio recordings would no longer be retained by default. Instead, Apple employees would rely on computer-generated transcripts of speech
  • Siri users would be able to opt in to share audio recordings – and would be able to opt out “at any time”
  • only Apple employees would have access to recordings, and any recordings that had been made “inadvertently” would be deleted

The turnaround was an unusual move from Apple, said Adam Wright, a tech analyst at market research firm IDC. “I think they’ve been caught off-guard a little bit,” he told the BBC. “I don’t think they’ve been completely forthcoming or transparent in their use of data.”

Part of the controversy over using humans to grade voice recordings was that Siri users may not always have been aware that their conversations could be listened to in this way. The Irish data protection authority, Apple’s lead data privacy regulator in Europe, had previously said it was looking into the matter of grading. A spokeswoman for the commission said it had noted Apple’s latest statement.

Games, News, Tech

Gaming faces is #MeToo moment

Game developers are highlighting sexual harassment in the industry after several people accused colleagues and peers of assault and abuse. Many women came forward and shared their experiences online, after a developer posted a blog alleging she was raped by a colleague.

The allegations cannot be detailed for legal reasons. But the wave of posts has been compared to the “me too” movement, which exposed harassment in the film industry.

“Video games are having a #metoo moment. The toxicity from fans has been well documented for years but the toxic, abusive, predatory behavior between developers has mostly been spoken in whispers between trusted friends,” said media critic and writer Anita Sarkeesian.

“I’m in awe of the bravery of those who have spoken up today.” The “me too” movement took off after a number of women accused film executive Harvey Weinstein of sexual harassment, abuse or rape. Mr Weinstein denies the charges.


The current wave of allegations from within the games industry started on Monday after one developer posted a detailed account of rape and abusive behavior by a former colleague. It was followed by several accounts of sexual harassment from other developers.

Many women described being groped or grabbed at industry networking events. Others said men had tried to lure them to hotel rooms with the promise of work opportunities or collaborations. Some of the accounts detail long periods of emotional manipulation and abuse by senior colleagues.

Many of those posting said they felt “dehumanized” by the experiences, which had a lasting effect on their mental health. The allegations have been made shortly before the Pax West gaming conference, which will see thousands of indie game developers head to Seattle, Washington, on 30 August.

The “Times Up” campaign group, which fights sexual harassment, called the actions described in the posts as “disturbing” and “unconscionable”. “This should be a moment of reckoning for the industry. This culture of sexual harassment, gas-lighting and retaliation cannot go on any longer,” the group said.

News, Tech

Facial recognition: School ID checks lead to GDPR fine

A watchdog has penalised a local authority for trialling facial recognition on high-school students in Sweden to keep track of attendance. The Swedish Data Protection Authority (DPA) fined the Skelleftea municipality200,000 Swedish Krona (£16,800, $20,700) for flouting a privacy law.

The trial involved tracking 22 students over three weeks and detecting when each pupil entered a classroom. This is the first time that Sweden has ever issued a fine under GDPR.

The General Data Protection Regulation, which came into force last year, classes facial images and other biometric information as being a special category of data, with added restrictions on its use.

The DPA indicated that the fine would have been bigger had the trial been longer. According to technology magazine ComputerSweden, Swedish authorities decided to investigate after reading media reports of Anderstorp’s High School’s trial.

The local authority told Swedish state broadcaster SVT Nyheter in February that teachers had been spending 17,000 hours a year reporting attendance, and the authority had decided to see whether facial-recognition technology could speed up the process.

‘Fairly safe’

The trial, which took place in autumn 2018, had been so successful that the local authority was considering extending it. Jorgen Malm, who oversees Anderstorp’s High School and Naturbruk’s High School for the municipality, told SVT that the technology was “fairly safe”.

According to the DPA ruling, although the school secured parents’ consent to monitor the students, the regulator did not feel that it was a legally adequate reason to collect such sensitive personal data.

The regulator noted that although some parts of the school could be deemed to be “public”, students had a certain expectation of privacy when they entered a classroom. It said there were less intrusive ways that their attendance could have been detected without involving camera surveillance.

As a result, the DPA found that Skelleftea’s local authority had unlawfully processed sensitive biometric data, as well as failing to complete an adequate impact assessment, which would have included consulting the regulator and gaining prior approval before starting the trial.